PORE Research Record • PIJCACE Journal
Nithin Sridhar’s Chatuh Shloki Manusmrti: Tradition, Authority, and the Fourfold Framework
Piyal Bhattacharya1
Journal:
Poorvam Int. J. Creative Arts & Cult. Expr. (PIJCACE)
•
Volume:
1 (2026)
•
Issue:
2
•
ISSN:
3107-6866
•
Bibliometric Architecture
Research Metrics
Independent Citations
Works citing this paper
OpenAlex
Global open academic graph
0
OpenCitations (COCI)
Open citation infrastructure
0
Google Scholar
Synchronized via SerpApi
Not available
Unique Citing Works Detected:
0
Harmonized across Google Scholar, OpenAlex, OpenCitations & verified citations.
Scholarly References
Works this paper cites
References (Crossref)
Registered in Crossref deposit metadata
0
Important Distinction (Section 21): References represent the bibliography cited by this article. Citations represent subsequent published scholarship that cites this article.
Journal Readership
Canonical journal metrics
Article Views
Full text reads on Poorvam Journal
633
Article Downloads
Direct PDF downloads on Poorvam Journal
40
Live engagement metrics measured directly from the original PIJCACE journal publication record.
Verification & Discovery Channels
Independently Verify this Scholarship
PORE provides direct, transparent discovery links to external scholarly registries so scholars can independently audit bibliographic data and indexing status.
Detected Citing Works (0)
Harvested from OpenAlex & OpenCitations
No citing works detected yet by integrated open bibliometric providers.
New citations are detected automatically through periodic scheduled synchronization.
Publication Abstract
This review essay examines Chatuh Shloki Manusmriti: An English Commentary by Nithin Sridhar, situating the work within the broader intellectual framework of the Indian śāstric tradition. The study analyses the author’s decision to interpret the philosophical architecture of the Manusaṃhitā through the first four verses of the opening chapter, read in light of the classical hermeneutic structure of anubandha catuṣṭaya. By foregrounding questions of adhikārī (qualified reader), prayojana (purpose), and viṣaya (subject matter), the essay argues that Sridhar’s work attempts to reintroduce contemporary readers—particularly those outside traditional modes of learning—to the conceptual world of Dharmaśāstra. The review further examines the methodological implications of employing the bhāṣya tradition as a modern interpretive tool and reflects on the distinction between śruti and smṛti, authorship, and authority within the Indian knowledge system. While acknowledging the book’s pedagogical strengths and its contribution to renewed discussions on the Manusmṛti, the essay also highlights certain translation and interpretive issues, suggesting that the text is best understood within the framework of śāstra pramāṇa rather than as an independent epistemic authority.
Canonical Article Publication
The full manuscript, typography, figures, references, and PDF download remain published on the official PIJCACE journal portal.