Authors in Conversation
Enrollment Open
A peer-reviewed biannual journal publishing research, critique, and creative expression at the intersection of classical traditions and contemporary thought.
Join our hybrid seminars where scholars, artists, and practitioners from across the globe gather to explore the living traditions of Indian heritage in contemporary and digital arts.
View All Events
Authors in Conversation
Enrollment Open
Authors in Conversation
Enrollment Open
Speaker
Bartholomew Ryan is a philosopher and musician, and holds a position as Research Professor…
EXPLORING CRITICAL LIVES: FERNANDO PESSOA AND PH…
Speaker
Ruth Vanita is a scholar, writer, and translator whose work spans Indian literary history,…
Exploring The Dharma of Justice in the Sanskrit …
Speaker
Monima Chadha is Professor of Indian Philosophy at the Faculty of Philosophy, University o…
Exploring Selfless Minds: A Contemporary Perspec…
Speaker
Swami Medhananda is a monk of the Ramakrishna Order and an academic philosopher, currently…
Exploring Infinite Paths to Infinite Reality…
Speaker
Arjun Bharadwaj is an author and researcher with a deep interest in classical literature, …
The Dramatic Element in Kumārasambhavam – A Dial…
Speaker
Dan Zahavi is a Professor of Philosophy and director of the Center for Subjectivity Resear…
Being We: Phenomenological Contributions to Soci…
Speaker
Nirmalya Narayan Chakraborty is presently Vice-Chancellor of Presidency University, Kolkat…
Cite It: A Cautionary Note on Matilal’s Way of D…
Speaker
Jonardon Ganeri is the Bimal. K. Matilal Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Univ…
Fernando Pessoa: Imagination and the Self – A Di…
Speaker
Prof. Madhucchanda Sen is a Professor of Philosophy at Jadavpur University, where she has …
Exploring the Externalism and the Mental : A Dia…
Speaker
Prof. Jay L. Garfield FAHA is the Doris Silbert Professor in the Humanities and Professor …
Exploring the Subject as Freedom: A Dialogue wit…
Speaker
Prof. Nalini Bhushan is Andrew W. Mellon Professor Emerita in the Humanities and Professor…
Exploring the Subject as Freedom: A Dialogue wit…
Authors in Conversation
Authors in Conversation
Authors in Conversation
Authors in Conversation
Cite It
Authors in Conversation
Authors in Conversation
Authors in Conversation
Call for Participation · Commemorative Volume
Poorvam International Journal invites scholars from across the philosophical world to contribute to a commemorative volume honouring one of the most influential philosophers of our time — the scholar who inaugurated our own Authors in Conversation series.
Abstract submission opens 1 July 2026
Poorvam International Journal is committed to maximum visibility and scholarly impact. Our content is discoverable through leading academic indexes and databases, ensuring global reach for researchers across every discipline.
DOI Registration & Global Registry
Published Content Integrity
Scholarly Literature Search
European Open Research Infrastructure
AI-Powered Research Discovery
Global Open Scholarly Metadata
Scientific Literature Database
Open Ukrainian Citation Index
Research Discovery by Editage
Publisher Verification
All indexing is independently verified. DOI prefix 10.63752/pijcace registered with Crossref.
This review essay examines Nalini Bhushan and Jay L. Garfield's new translation of Krishnachandra Bhattacharyya's Subject as Freedom (Oxford University Press, 2026), a text long regarded as philosophically significant yet notoriously difficult. It argues that the edition exceeds ordinary translation practice, functioning at once as translation, commentary, and interpretive intervention, and proposes that Bhushan and Garfield are best understood as contemporary bhāṣyakāras: active philosophical participants rather than neutral transmitters. The review discusses the editors' lexical choices, such as rendering "object" as "intentional object," and their extensive introduction, which situates the text within Bhattacharyya's engagement with Advaita Vedānta through the "bookend" works of 1925 and 1936. While affirming the sophistication of this Advaitic reading, the review questions whether it constrains the text's methodological independence, given Bhattacharyya's phenomenological idiom and his departures from traditional Advaitic vocabulary. It concludes that the edition's parallel text presentation and editorial apparatus make it the standard English entry point into Bhattacharyya's thought, restoring him to philosophical discussion beyond his usual classification as an Advaita representative alone.
This study proposes that there exists a deeper structural affinity between performance practice and philosophical inquiry than is commonly acknowledged. Grounded in the foundational insights of Piyal Bhattacharya on the metaphysics of embodiment in the Nāṭyaśāstra, this paper builds upon his framework by drawing upon philosophical systems such as Ashtanga Yoga and Kashmir Shaivism. More specifically, it argues that the process of nṛtta may be understood as analogous to the yogic or tantric progression toward states such as Samprajñāta samādhi. Within this mapping, sthāna (along with sthiti) corresponds to dhāraṇā (focused concentration), karaṇa to dhyāna (meditative absorption), and aṅgahāra to samādhi (complete integration). In this context, the paper further argues that the performer employs sthānas as an initial step toward depersonalization—shifting from individual identity toward a structured, archetypal presence. This transformation is not merely aesthetic but contemplative, requiring both technical precision and a deeply internalized state of awareness. Through this lens, Abhinavagupta’s engagement with the Nāṭyaśāstra can be seen as something that recognizes performance as a valid and potent pathway toward higher states of consciousness.
Śrī Caitanya Deva, revered in Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava tradition as the combined manifestation of Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Śrī Rādhā, is widely recognized for his philosophical contributions and devotional movement. This article highlights a less-explored dimension of his genius–his profound mastery of Sāhitya Śāstra (literary theory and poetics)–through a critical examination of his scholarly encounter with the Kashmirian digvijayī scholar Keśava Bhaṭṭa, as detailed in Śrī Caitanya Caritāmṛta and Caitanya Bhāgavata. During their meeting on the banks of the Gaṅgā, Keśava Bhaṭṭa, renowned for his extemporaneous composition (ghaṭikāśataka), composed one hundred verses glorifying the Gaṅgā. Caitanya selected one verse in the Śikharinī metre and subjected it to a masterful critique based on the principles of Alaṅkāraśāstra. He identified five poetic defects (pañcadoṣa)–two instances of avimṛṣṭavidheyāṃśa, viruddhamatikṛt, bhagnakrama, and punarātta–and five literary ornaments (pañcālaṅkāra): anuprāsa (alliteration), punaruktavadābhāsa, upamā (simile), virodhābhāsa (semblance of contradiction), and anumāna (inference). The article provides detailed definitions and textual analysis of each doṣa and alaṅkāra, drawing from authoritative texts like Sāhityadarpaṇa and Alaṅkārakaustubha. It demonstrates how Caitanya’s analysis reveals both the aesthetic strengths and compositional flaws of the verse, underscoring the primacy of doṣa-guṇa vicāra (critical evaluation of defects and merits) in poetic composition. This episode not only affirms Caitanya’s extraordinary erudition in Sanskrit poetics alongside grammar and philosophy but also exemplifies his humility and spiritual magnetism, which ultimately led to Keśava Bhaṭṭa’s surrender. The study thus illuminates Caitanya’s multifaceted brilliance as a consummate connoisseur of Sāhitya Śāstra.
This article examines the concept of sādhāraṇīkaraṇa (generalization) as the indispensable condition for the experience of rasa in classical Indian poetics. While rasa is traditionally regarded as the soul of poetry, its realization requires the dissolution of specific spatial, temporal, and personal associations embedded in poetic elements such as vibhāva, anubhāva, vyabhicāribhāva, and sthāyibhāva. Through the process of generalization, these elements are freed from worldly limitations, allowing the sahṛdaya to experience emotions in a purified, universalized form. The study further argues that sādhāraṇīkaraṇa operates through a distinctive mode of aesthetic cognition that cannot be reduced to ordinary forms of knowledge such as illusion, doubt, or resemblance. By temporarily transcending self–other distinctions and worldly dualities, aesthetic experience approaches a Vedāntic state of non-duality and bliss. Thus, sādhāraṇīkaraṇa is shown to function not merely as a poetic mechanism but as a bridge between aesthetic enjoyment and metaphysical insight.
This critical essay examines the metaphysical foundations of embodiment in Bharata's Nāṭyaśāstra, arguing that the sthānas, cārīs, and karaṇas are not merely physical movements but psychophysical embodiments of cosmic tattvas. Drawing on parallels between the cosmological unfolding described in Taittirīya Upaniṣad and the theatrical universe of nāṭya, this study demonstrates how Bharata systematically creates an 'extra-daily' performance dimension through consecrated space, non-empirical time (tāla), and embodied gravitational presence. The essay explores how expansion of space through sthānas manifests specific energies (rūpa and guṇa), how cārīs dynamically explore floor and aerial space, and how karaṇas serve as epistemological tools for acquiring embodied knowledge. Central to this analysis is the concept of Kaiśikī vṛtti, which transforms daily actions into extra-daily artistic expressions capable of generating alaukika rasa experience. This metaphysical framework reveals Bharata's system as a parallel universe creation on stage, where psychophysical embodiments serve the ultimate purpose of delivering dharmic teachings while elevating both performers and spectators beyond mundane emotional experiences.
This paper examines Pranab Kumar Sen's distinctive and comparatively lesser-known analysis of the concept of ideology, as articulated in his 1992 seminar paper "Philosophy, Science and Ideology," later included in Knowledge, Truth and Realism. While Sen is widely recognized for his contributions to debates on truth, meaning, logic, and the realism-anti-realism controversy, his reflections on ideology reveal a striking moment of intellectual courage. Against the prevailing and often populist invocations of ideology, Sen undertakes a conceptual inquiry into its very meaning. The paper focuses on one central issue Sen treats with seriousness: the relation between philosophy, science, and ideology. By identifying certain defining characteristics of ideology, such as dogmatism, closure to criticism, and resistance to self-correction, Sen argues that ideology is fundamentally incompatible with philosophy and science, both of which are essentially self-critical and epistemically open enterprises. This study reconstructs Sen's analysis of ideology without engaging the broader political-philosophical literature on the subject, as its primary concern is his conceptual framework. In doing so, it also offers a critical reflection on Sen's position, assessing its implications for understanding the normative role of philosophy in society.
A constellation of interconnected platforms, publications, and people — all united by a commitment to open, ethical, and world-class scholarly exchange.
A unified platform for open scholarly communication — connecting authors, reviewers, and readers across disciplines.
Our flagship peer-reviewed biannual journal publishing research and creative expression at the intersection of arts and culture.
The publishing imprint of Poorvam — bringing scholarly monographs, edited volumes, and creative works to global audiences.
Carcā (चर्चा) extends the Poorvam knowledge network - A living space for dialogue and learning
Your destination for literary excellence, cultural commentary, and profound reflections from India and the world.
An open-access, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary biannual e-journal publishing original research and creative scholarship by students across Science, Arts, and Commerce.
Are you a researcher or creative artist? Submit your manuscript and join our vibrant community.
Submit Your Work