Abstract
<jats:p>Spatial-numerical association reflects an internal "mental number line" where numerosities are mapped from left to right in space. While evidence from 8- to 9-month-old human infants suggests a privileged link between number and space, these findings do not definitively establish whether discrete numerosity or continuous quantity is the primary driver of spatialization due to the relatively extensive postnatal experience. Using domestic chicks (Gallus gallus), a model testable with minimal postnatal experience, we investigated precocial predispositions to map both discrete numerosities and continuous quantity (physical size) onto space. In Experiment 1, we replicated spatial-numerical association: chicks associated relatively smaller numerosities with the left hemispace and larger ones with the right hemispace. In Experiment 2, however, spatial-quantity association for physical size was asymmetric: chicks showed a rightward preference for smaller sizes and no congruent small-left/large-right mapping. Together with infant data, these findings indicate that a generalized and congruent spatial-magnitude association does not emerge at the earliest stages of development, and challenge accounts positing that spatial mappings for continuous magnitudes precede and underpin the spatial organization of number.</jats:p>