Abstract
<jats:p>Nineteen individuals with diverse public health leadership experience across different levels and domains, from countries with varying levels of economic development, and who have direct involvement in crises were interviewed. A concise literature review was conducted, examining the intersection of politics and public health leadership, as well as a brief review of relevant existing leadership courses, training programs, and fellowships. The interviews were transcribed in full, anonymized, coded (total 1104 coded excerpts, 762 discrete excerpts), and used as the basis for analyzing findings. Our research identified four thematic areas at the intersection of public health and political leadership in public health crises: attributes and skills; role of and threshold for political engagement; structural elements underpinning effective public health response; and modalities for building public health leadership. Public health leaders need to learn core skills, especially effective communication, diplomacy, and advocacy, and cultivate key attributes, especially integrity and humility, that support their ability to engage with political decision makers. Political leaders need to contribute productively ways, and at the appropriate time, to ensure societal cohesion and facilitate a well-resourced multisectoral response with public health at its core. Pre-established relationships and coordination mechanisms can play a supporting and productive role when crises strike. Strategies that incorporate experiential learning, peer collaboration, and mentorship are central to building the skills public health leaders need to succeed in crises. Many tangible steps can be taken to foster and support public health leadership including: integrating the political dimensions of public health into public health education; tailoring public health trainings to include practical skills such as stakeholder engagement, effective communication, negotiation, policy advocacy, and community engagement; creating supportive ecosystems through peer, mentor, and fellowship approaches; and advocating for strengthening the structural interface between politics and public health.</jats:p>