Abstract
<jats:p>Background: Bicuspid aortic valve anatomy increases procedural complexity during transcatheter aortic valve implantation, yet outcome-oriented anatomic risk stratification for intraprocedural events remains limited. Aims: We aimed to develop and externally validate an anatomy-driven score to predict a composite intraprocedural endpoint, assessed at exit from the procedure room, in bicuspid transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: Consecutive patients with bicuspid aortic valve undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were analysed in a development cohort (N=793) and a multicentre external validation cohort (N=134). Candidate preprocedural computed tomography and echocardiographic variables were prespecified by expert consensus and refined using penalized regression with bootstrap stability selection within a domain-constrained framework. A five-indicator score (0 to 10 points) was derived from routine imaging metrics spanning the ascending aorta, aortic root, valve complex, annulus-outflow tract unit, and left ventricle, and tested using multivariable logistic regression. Results: The composite intraprocedural endpoint occurred in 101/793 (12.7%) patients in the development cohort, with stepwise increases across risk strata (7.2%, 13.3%, 30.6%; p<0.001). Each 1-point increase was independently associated with higher risk (odds ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.47). A similar gradient was observed in external validation (3.1%, 10.8%, 50.0%; p=0.012; odds ratio 1.55 per point), with a C-statistic of 0.725. Higher risk categories were associated with lower early safety and higher 30-day and 1-year mortality. Conclusions: An anatomy-driven score derived from routine preprocedural imaging demonstrates graded discrimination of intraprocedural risk and may inform procedural planning in bicuspid transcatheter aortic valve implantation.</jats:p>