Abstract
<jats:p>Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death. Despite sustained efforts to identify high-risk women in the mid-trimester, accurate prediction remains difficult. Quantitative cervical ultrasound texture has been proposed as a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth. However, earlier models were developed in small single-centre samples and were not externally validated. We developed image-texture (Local Binary Patterns with a Random Forest), deep-learning (Vision Transformer), clinical-variable, and multimodal models to predict spontaneous preterm birth on the prospective GARBH-Ini cohort. We then externally validated our best models on an independent cohort scanned on a different ultrasound machine. Our best overall model reached an internal-test area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% CI 0.60, 0.82), but performed modestly at 0.52 (95% CI 0.38, 0.64) externally. The deep-learning and multimodal models did not perform better. Discrimination appeared higher in a clinically high-risk subgroup at the 34-week threshold. These estimates were imprecise because of few cases and need to be confirmed in future studies. Among the several likely reasons for the modest external performance is the heterogeneity of preterm birth. Predicting distinct preterm-birth subtypes separately, and integrating additional biomarkers and data domains, might improve model performance. Keywords: preterm birth; cervical ultrasound; prediction model; external validation; deep learning</jats:p>