Stereoelectroencephalography accuracy in a series of over 3000 trajectories

<jats:p>Background and Objectives: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) involves the implantation of intracerebral electrodes to investigate drug-resistant epilepsy. SEEG requires millimetric accuracy to ensure safety and optimal mapping. Although studies have evaluated SEEG accuracy, there is substantial variability in reporting. Here we report on implantation accuracy in a large series using the most common accuracy metrics described in the literature and perform a detailed analysis of contributing factors. Methods: SEEG implantations between 2013 and 2025 were included. Application accuracy was computed for each implanted electrode. Specifically, Euclidean, radial, depth, and angle error were calculated at both target and entry points. Correlative and multivariable analyses were conducted between each variable and error metric. Trajectories were also grouped by atlas-derived lobar target. Results: No metrics met assumptions of normality and thus we report accuracy using median with interquartile range (IQR). In a series of 3176 trajectories, median Euclidean target and entry errors were lower for robot-assisted electrodes (n=2858) at 2.19 (IQR: 1.54-2.98) mm and 1.38 (IQR: 0.89-2.01) mm respectively, compared to frame-based (n=318, p&lt;.001) at 2.76 (IQR:1.79-3.76) mm and 2.21 (IQR: 1.42-3.32) mm. Correlation and multivariable regression analysis showed target error was positively correlated with implantation angle, scalp thickness, skull thickness, and trajectory length. Target error was also higher in obese patients. On lobar analysis, parietal lobe trajectories were the most accurate and frontal lobe trajectories were the least accurate. On temporal lobe trajectory analysis, posterior hippocampus trajectories were the most accurate and temporal pole trajectories were the least accurate. Presence of mesial temporal sclerosis also impacted accuracy. Conclusions: We present a detailed description of SEEG implantation accuracy, demonstrating the superior accuracy and speed of robot-assisted to frame-based methods. Furthermore, we analyzed how accuracy varies with specific factors from a global to trajectory level, which can be accounted for when planning SEEG implantations.</jats:p>