Evaluation of Iran's Legislative Criminal Policy on the Smuggling of Goods and Currency via Official Channels: A Critical Analysis of the 2013 Anti‑Smuggling Law and Its 2021 Amendments

<jats:p>The smuggling of goods and currency through official channels remains a deep‑seated, structural challenge within Iran’s economy. Despite the enactment of multiple laws – especially the 2013 Law on Combating the Smuggling of Goods and Currency and its 2021 amendments – this phenomenon has not subsided. In certain dimensions, such as reverse smuggling, fuel trafficking, and organised currency smuggling, it has even grown worse. This article adopts a descriptive‑analytical method. It draws on library‑based resources, legal documents, doctrinal opinions, and executive reports. The aim is to critically assess Iran’s legislative criminal policy concerning the smuggling of goods and currency through official channels. The central question asks: how successfully has the legislator balanced multiple competing goals – prevention, repression, rehabilitation, and compensation? Does the current approach align with the core principles of preventive criminology and criminal justice? Our findings show that, while the law has made positive strides in systematising criminalisation, distinguishing different forms of smuggling, and establishing preventive bodies, it still labours under significant structural and substantive shortcomings. These include an overly broad and ambiguous definition of smuggling, multiple adjudicatory bodies leading to protracted proceedings, the dominance of an "enemy criminal law" ethos with disproportionate penalties, and wide‑ranging, loosely regulated exemptions that foster rent‑seeking and corruption. Moreover, the law pays relatively little attention to social prevention, reverse smuggling, and the trafficking of health‑related goods. Most critically, a profound gap exists between the written law and its actual enforcement – a gap caused by weak inter‑agency coordination, inadequate technological infrastructure, and systematic corruption within customs and regulatory institutions. The article concludes that any meaningful reform of legislative criminal policy, if not accompanied by deeper macroeconomic restructuring, greater customs transparency, robust anti‑corruption measures, and genuine empowerment of border communities, is destined to fail. We end by offering actionable recommendations for revising the law and improving its implementation.</jats:p>