Deprecated: Function curl_close() is deprecated since 8.5, as it has no effect since PHP 8.0 in /home/u483256323/domains/poorvam.com/public_html/subdomains/pore/includes/api.php on line 184
Back to Search View Original Cite This Article

Abstract

<jats:p>Securing performance of obligations through various methods has been and remains a widespread and prevalent practice in Armenia. Recently, the number of individual bankruptcy cases has increased significantly which, depending on their outcome, give rise to numerous practical and legal issues. In this article, the author addresses a phenomenon frequently encountered in civil law relations about an individual borrower, the performance of whose obligations toward a bank is secured by a guarantee. Specifically, it addresses situations where a court renders a judgment terminating the bankruptcy proceedings concerning the borrower and discharging the borrower's obligations thereby raising the issue of whether upon the entry into force of such a judgment the underlying guarantee is consequently terminated. The article concludes that there is a legislative gap; the current regulatory framework does not explicitly clarify whether, in the aforementioned circumstances, the guarantee shall be deemed terminated, or whether banks should nevertheless retain the right to demand the performance of the principal obligation from the guarantor. The author contends that the guarantee obligation should not be terminated in the aforementioned scenario. It is evident that the existing legislative gap has resulted in contradictory practices giving rise to legal uncertainty.</jats:p>

Show More

Keywords

guarantee performance obligations whether terminated

Related Articles


Deprecated: Function curl_close() is deprecated since 8.5, as it has no effect since PHP 8.0 in /home/u483256323/domains/poorvam.com/public_html/subdomains/pore/includes/api.php on line 76
PORE

About

Connect