Abstract
<jats:p>The purpose of the article is to analyze the issue of using the results of operational-investigative activities carried out for the purpose of revealing a crime in the criminal proceedings of the Republic of Armenia. The legal norms are such that often both the investigating authorities and the prosecutor's office, as well as the court interpret them in different ways. This refers to a certain contradiction between Part 3 of Article 96 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia and Article 4 of the Law “On Operative-Investigative Activities”. In other words, the article aims to present a problem that has arisen or may arise in legal practice. In this regard, the article is also relevant, since the approaches presented may be of interest to students, lawyers, law enforcement officers, and judges.</jats:p>