Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Appositive Relative Clauses as Parenthetical Constructions, Ոչ սահմանափակող որոշիչ երկորդական նախադասությունների խոսույթային գործաբանական գործառույթները որպես միջանկյալ կառույցներ, Дискурсивно-прагматические функции аппозитивных относительных предложений как вставных конструкций

<jats:p>This paper examines the discourse functions of appositive relative clauses (ARCs) based on Chafe's (1976) information-packaging theory, which suggests that the information status of the main clause (MC) and that of the ARC differ significantly, inasmuch as the main clause conveys foreground content while ARCs provide background information, with the former playing a decisive role in the interpretation of the overall utterance. While ARCs have so far been thoroughly studied morphological and syntactic points of view, their semantic representation and pragmatic interpretation have received comparatively less attention. Based on Loock's (2010) classification, three main types of ARCs are identified: continuative appositive relative clauses (CARCs), relevance appositive relative clauses (RARCs), and subjectivity appositive relative clauses (SARCs). While RARCs and SARCs generally provide supporting details and background information, CARCs are unique in that they present events on the same informational level as the main clause, effectively placing both parts of the sentence in the foreground. This blurry demarcation line between main and subordinate clauses shows that ARCs are far more than supplementary details; they considerably contribute to the meaning of the utterance through establishing a number of semantic and chronological relations between clauses. These inter-clause connections including, but not limited to, causality, consequence, contrast, or concession shape the semantic weight of ARCs and reveal variability of their illocutionary force across contexts and interlocutors.</jats:p>