АРХІТЕКТУРА СИСТЕМИ СТРАТЕГІЧНОГО УПРАВЛІННЯ СТІЙКІСТЮ ПРОМИСЛОВОСТІ ЗА ДОМІНАНТАМИ ЦИРКУЛЯРНОЇ ЕКОНОМІКИ: РІВНІ, СТРУКТУРА ТА ВЗАЄМОЗВ'ЯЗКИ, ARCHITECTURE OF THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR INDUSTRIAL RESILIENCE BASED ON CIRCULAR ECONOMY DOMINANTS: LEVELS, STRUCTURE, AND INTERRELATIONS

<jats:p>The article substantiates the architecture of the strategic management system for industrial resilience in Ukraine (SMSIR), built around the dominants of the circular economy. The relevance of the study is driven by the multifactorial nature of contemporary challenges facing the national industrial sector: spatial differentiation of real-sector development, disruption of production and logistics linkages, resource constraints, and the necessity of implementing circular economy principles amid war and post-war recovery. The purpose is to substantiate a multilevel adaptive architecture ensuring coordination of goals, mechanisms, tools, and activities of management entities within a unified functional framework. The proposed architecture integrates six interrelated levels: target, spatial, institutional, functional, information-analytical, and implementation-transformational. Unlike conventional sectoral approaches, it is grounded in a spatial-network logic, in which regional industrial zones and industrial-logistics axes serve as the basic functionally integrated spatial-economic units. The interrelations among the levels are shown to have a non-linear, contour-cyclical character, forming a closed adaptive management loop. For each level, the article details the main structural elements, management functions, levers and regulators, and the corresponding circular economy dominants. A methodical approach to forming the system is substantiated, comprising five sequential stages, and a seven-stage cyclical model of architecture development is proposed, incorporating a PDCA-based adaptive-corrective loop. The main threats and risks are systematized into six groups: military-security, institutional, resource-financial, logistical, technological, and circular-transformational. The scientific novelty lies in treating the circular economy not as a separate environmental policy direction but as a cross-cutting principle embedded in every level of the architecture. The results provide a methodological basis for further modeling the system's functioning and selecting effective management levers for industrial resilience under polycrisis and the transition to a circular economy.</jats:p>