Abstract
<jats:p>The research aims to identify and typologize the contradictions arising from the integration of the subject “Basics of Safety and Motherland Protection” (BSMP) into Russia’s unified educational space and to justify ways to overcome them. The article demonstrates that BSMP performs a dual function, combining the development of practice-oriented safety competencies with the objectives of civic and patriotic education. The work examines the challenges of designing educational outcomes for the BSMP subject within the framework of the Federal State Educational Standards. As a result, the study identifies and systematizes institutional contradictions (between content unification and regional risk differentiation, and between strategic directives and local practices) as well as methodological contradictions in designing the tripartite system of results (subject-specific, meta-subject, and personal). It is established that the key problem is the misalignment of these three types of outcomes, which are constructed as parallel lists lacking integration mechanisms and adequate assessment procedures. The necessity of transitioning to flexible course implementation schemes is justified, including: a framework-modular curriculum structure with a variable regional component; a scenario-modular approach to organizing the educational process based on end-to-end simulation models (case studies, tactical games, projects); and the creation of a flexible assessment system that legitimizes local evaluation tools. The scientific novelty of the work is defined by the proposed conceptual scheme for systemic integration and the design of the BSMP educational process to achieve substantive, rather than formal, unity within the educational space.</jats:p>