Abstract
<p>**Background Psychological resilience is fundamental for the educational inclusion and mental health of immigrant students. However, the current evidence base remains fragmented across various disciplines, exhibiting significant conceptual ambiguity and a scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There is an urgent need to align social psychiatry research with clinical standards to transform "living" research into reliable evidence for educational policy. **Objectives This systematic review aims to conduct a methodological audit of existing resilience-building interventions for immigrant students. The primary objective is to determine the technical quality, certainty of evidence, and reporting transparency of these interventions according to international clinical standards (Cochrane and TIDieR). **Methods The search will be conducted across 10 multidisciplinary databases, including MEDLINE, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library. Studies will be selected using the PICO framework, specifically targeting immigrant students aged 12–15. We will include RCTs and robust cohort studies. Methodological quality will be audited using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool and NIH quality assessment tools. Certainty of evidence will be rated via the GRADE system. Reporting transparency will be evaluated through the TIDieR checklist. Findings will be integrated through a systematic narrative synthesis organized within a multi-level socio-ecological framework. **Expected Results The review will identify critical gaps in reporting transparency and methodological rigor. By auditing intervention materials and randomization processes, this study will provide a practical guide for researchers to align psychosocial interventions with Cochrane standards, facilitating the translation of research into evidence-based educational policy.</p>