Abstract
<jats:p>The aim of the study is to identify attitudes towards conflict and consolidation in online communications among young migrants from Armenia, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan in relation to Muscovites, as well as attitudes of members of the host society towards migrants. The theoretical and methodological framework and research methods are determined by the complex characteristics of the object and subject of the study. The study was conducted using an online questionnaire survey. The study was conducted using an online questionnaire survey of migrants from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and Russia. A quota-based sampling method was used to ensure equal representation of each country. The main criteria for participation were age (18–35 years), residence in Russia and the use of Russian-language social media. The results of the study indicate the simultaneous presence in the mind of cognitive elements shaping attitudes that contribute to both consolidation and conflict, albeit to varying degrees of intensity. Positions favoring consolidation are formed primarily through direct daily experience and during adaptation within diasporas. In contrast, the cognitive foundations for a conflictual perception arise from a sense of conflicting interests, are reinforced through online communication, and are most pronounced in the minds of members of the host society. The emotional-affective component of intergroup attitudes is determined by a complex interplay of factors that elicit both mutual sympathy and antipathy. An emotional predisposition towards peaceful interaction is more characteristic of young migrants. Among native Muscovites, according to the data obtained, feelings of irritation, psychological discomfort and selective ethnic alienation are recorded statistically significantly more often. The conative (behavioural) component of social attitudes does not exhibit a direct orientation towards conflict or cooperation, but represents a set of contradictory potential actions. Intentions aimed at cooperation are primarily linked to joint activities in real life, recognition of the need for constructive interaction, and the choice of compromise approaches when resolving disputes. At the same time, the foundations for confrontational models of behavior in the online environment are shaped by the prevalence of intra-group ties, a lack of inter-group trust, heightened caution, and a pronounced willingness to defend one’s group’s interests in the context of perceived confrontation. Prospects for further research lie in formulating recommendations for the development of legislation to regulate migration and prevent conflict between Russian citizens and young migrants.</jats:p>